If a tenant remains on the property after the expiration of their lease, what is commonly required to maintain occupancy?

When a tenant remains on a property after their lease has expired, this situation is often referred to as "holdover" tenancy. In many jurisdictions, if the landlord does not oppose the tenant's continued occupancy, it can signal to the tenant that they may remain on the property without the necessity of renewing the lease formally or entering into a new lease agreement.

Absence of opposition from the landlord usually indicates approval of the tenant staying on the property until a new agreement or understanding is reached. This practice can lead to a month-to-month tenancy, which is often how holdover tenancies are treated, allowing for flexibility for both the tenant and landlord.

The other choices suggest formal action, such as written permission or a new lease, which while possibly needed in some cases or jurisdictions, are not universally required in situations where the landlord does not actively oppose the tenant's continued presence. Similarly, paying an additional fee is not a standard requirement in the absence of opposition, as the tenant's rights may continue based solely on the landlord's inaction.